Parents charge cronyism
Critics say St. Saviour principal was canned to make room for priest’s pal
By MichÈle De Meglio
They claim that Rev. Daniel Murphy fired James Flanagan, veteran principal of St. Saviour Elementary School on Eighth Avenue in Park Slope, to make room for “his friend,” Maura Lorenzen, the co−director of the Congregation Beth Elohim Early Childhood Center.
“I don’t know anything about her. She might be fine, I don’t know. But there’s a lot of conflict of interest involved as far as how the selection was made because she is on the Parish Council, which is part of the decision−making process,” said Cindy Brolsma, who has three children at St. Saviour. “It feels like it wasn’t a professionally run selection process, just kind of a handpicked friend of the priest. It feels like cronyism.”
With their concerns about the appointment process and their anger about Flanagan’s firing, parents are now calling for Murphy’s removal.
“We’re so frustrated and everyone is so sick of him appointing his friends to all the positions that we want to maybe have a new pastor, someone we could trust and feel good about,” Brolsma said.
According to Brolsma, some donors and alumni of the school are withholding financial contributions unless Murphy is removed.
Murphy would not comment on calls for his ouster.
All he would say in regard to the hiring and firing complaints was, “We don’t publicly discuss our employees’ employment situation.”
In a letter to parents, Murphy explained his reasoning for hiring Lorenzen, who has been an educator since 1982.
He wrote, “Maura is a lifelong parishioner of St. Saviour. She is a graduate of both our elementary school and our high school. Currently, Maura is a member of our Parish Council, our Welcome Team and our Hospitality Committee, as well as being a catechist in our School of Religion.”
The Diocese of Brooklyn has insisted that it would not become involved in any employment issues at St. Saviour.
| Super nail in canal coffin | Chestnut sets record; out−chomps Kobayashi |
Reader Comments
Holy Cow wrote on Jul 10, 2009 1:06 PM:
John H wrote on Jul 10, 2009 3:27 PM:
another former alum wrote on Jul 10, 2009 7:19 PM:
WHen you speak of cronyism think about who the President of the home school association is, the daughter of the 8th grade teacher, and the sister of another former teacher....HOw come you don't smell that!! "
Get Real wrote on Jul 10, 2009 7:31 PM:
I just don;t get it!
Why are you all so afraid of change?
It's a shame that Ms. Murphy, you all rememember her, (the former libraian, who Flannagan let go shortly before she was supposed to retire) isn't here to tell you her feelings toward Flannagan
WHo got the job after her? Oh yea thats right, Ms. S. "
John H wrote on Jul 10, 2009 8:16 PM:
Sebastian Flyte wrote on Jul 10, 2009 8:36 PM:
Sick Tired wrote on Jul 11, 2009 2:29 PM:
Sure, 25 years is a long time, but now it is time for someone who will bring a new perspective to the school and community. Stop the bellyaching and be thankful there was someone -- the pastor -- willing to go on a limb for the betterment of the school. "
John H wrote on Jul 11, 2009 5:28 PM:
No name wrote on Jul 11, 2009 5:42 PM:
Not Sick at all wrote on Jul 11, 2009 10:51 PM:
witness to the witless wrote on Jul 12, 2009 8:36 AM:
John H wrote on Jul 12, 2009 9:05 AM:
witness to the witless wrote on Jul 12, 2009 9:31 AM:
Mob Mentality wrote on Jul 12, 2009 9:54 AM:
Consider yourself lucky the adage "the apple doesn't fall far from the tree" doesn't apply to your family. (Unless, of course, this is not absolute truth, just the biased version of truth you seem to readily spout). Wow, mudslinging is contagious! "
Not Sick at all wrote on Jul 12, 2009 9:56 AM:
John H wrote on Jul 12, 2009 10:03 AM:
Mob Mentality wrote on Jul 12, 2009 10:27 AM:
Your last comment proves the point of so many of us who see in you what you can't see in yourselves--the inability to see something for what is is... if it quacks like a duck and walks like a duck, sometimes you have to accept it's simply a duck! You are reading underhandedness and malice into every breath Father Murphy or anyone who doesn't agree with you takes. YOU don't like what was done, or how it was done, or when it was done, or where it was done, so it must be wrong. And when someone makes a valid point, you find another angle from which to attack. You are letting paranoia cloud your vision. Listen, and listen good...I did not attack your children, I attacked YOU and your "Christian Values" or lack, thereof. And you know what, so ends my communication with you, as quite frankly, a verbal sparring match with someone who espouses drivel, is a waste of my time. But before I go, I will perform an act of kindness for you and save you the time and energy the nasty response you will be inclined to send will require...I believe it would be along the lines of "oh, you couldn't stand the heat, so you got out of the kitchen." I'm sure your response would be more vile, as I've read them all and your mean streak should be addressed by a therapist, but you've more important matters on your mind, you know, so little time, so many to slander... "
John H wrote on Jul 12, 2009 5:34 PM:
Alum Current Parent Child is 3rd Generation SSES wrote on Jul 13, 2009 1:35 AM:
Holy Cow wrote on Jul 13, 2009 9:50 PM:
another former alum wrote on Jul 14, 2009 9:31 PM:
Edward A. Puydak wrote on Jul 14, 2009 9:32 PM:
A slow transition (at least for one more year) would be the the best way to go and be more Christian like. Murphy is just a politician in priest garb. He takes care of himself and friends to the high life, preaches what he doesn't practice and then touts his accomplishments to those who already are standing behind his podium. We have seen this before in a past monsignor. The one who got the youth council kicked out. Obviously, children drained him too (Murphy reincarnated). How very sad when men who are suppose to follow Jesus's teachings find the most innocent "draining".
When they said St. Saviour is a close community, i think Murphy interpreted this as "closed community" since it is being run like a dictatorship. Father, this is our parish, not yours. Being chosen to lead doesn't make you a leader. You must act like a leader (not hide behind your excuses and lies to the press). So, yes I am disappointed in you and your leadership (your words Father not mine) Father, convince me otherwise. I saw the note you wrote my mom. You have sealed my opinion of you.
Edward A. Puydak
St. Saviour - Salutatorian - Class of 1986
One of eight Puydak's to attend St. Saviours
Family in the parish since 1910 "
FLAN-IS-DONE wrote on Jul 15, 2009 9:56 AM:
Spelling Tests- each student will write the chosen words on picket signs
History- each student will write history papers by digging into Father Murphy's past and sharing the results with the whole school.
Science- class will consist of looking into the closets for skeletons of those who dared to suggest that Flanagan should be removed.
Math- the classes will be designed to figure out how much cash does St. Saviour owe Flanagan? and who pays? The school? The church?
Religion- Let's rename the school St. Flanagan's. Start a new cult and worship him.
We can also have a goodbye party for Flanagan. But to be fair, we should make him pay to go to the party. "
former alum wrote on Jul 15, 2009 3:33 PM:
Now I understand why you support FLannigan, you are just like him, you are a little man, who obviously takes great pride in belittling former alums. You are arrogant, and so full of your self. i graduated last year and like most of my classmates, as well as other kids in the school hate that Twiddle Dee/Twiddle Dum Flannigan. He is a very self-centered man (and I use that term lightly). Unlike you and your friends, my parents did not force me to write this or force me to walk around wiht picket signs, get a life
Former alum "william F. Buckley, Jr. "
Team Murphy wrote on Jul 15, 2009 3:43 PM:
Extra Credit: Students will try to figure out when a non-renewal of a contract constitues "being fired". "
a concerned citizen wrote on Jul 15, 2009 3:44 PM:
jamie wrote on Jul 15, 2009 3:53 PM:
As I See It wrote on Jul 15, 2009 3:56 PM:
J wrote on Jul 15, 2009 4:03 PM:
John H wrote on Jul 15, 2009 5:16 PM:
parishioner wrote on Jul 15, 2009 8:04 PM:
You were correct in stating a PTA officer position is not a paid position, thereby rendering the word chronyism inaccurate when describing a PTA president who is related to a school employee, in this case an 8th grade teacher. Cronyism it may not be -- it is at best, a conflict of interest ; it is, at worst, unethical. PTA officers have a great deal of influence on where raised funds are directed and how they are to be spent. Whether you are naive or misinformed, I don't know, but you can be assured this is one step away from cronyism. Of course, no one is accusing either the PTA president or the teacher of any wrongdoing -- unfounded accusations, innuendo, assumptions etc. would not be very Christian like. But I'm sure you know this already. "
John H wrote on Jul 15, 2009 8:57 PM:
Been there seen that wrote on Jul 16, 2009 12:13 AM:
John H wrote on Jul 16, 2009 6:26 AM:
parishioner and parent wrote on Jul 16, 2009 1:36 PM:
Gertrude wrote on Jul 16, 2009 2:31 PM:
paroissien et parent wrote on Jul 16, 2009 3:04 PM:
Janie wrote on Jul 16, 2009 3:09 PM:
Junie B wrote on Jul 16, 2009 4:41 PM:
It seems to many that this situation has gone from bad to worse and presently borders on the insane. You are perceived very negatively by many of your fellow parishioners. Have you ever considered the possibility that maybe the reasons for the decision were not made public in an effort to avoid embarrassment and humiliation.and out of respect for the time Mr. Flanagan spent doing a good job? Times change and what once worked does not always continue to work. When one person or group of people reign for too long it can have a negative effect on people and institutions. In a government we often see a benevolent despot turn into a malignancy. History corroborates this .
It appears to me that Fr. Murphy has acted as a gentleman every step of the way. He has made a decision and has not gotten into verbal sparring with any of you no matter how hard you have tried to provoke him. I am sure his prayers include all of you each day. SSES has been run for far too long by Mr. Flanagan and his groupies, many of whom seem to have been put into positions of seeming authority based on their ability to mimic bobblehead dolls -shake their heads up and down while saying, "oh yes Jim of course Jim , anything you want Jim."
Fr. Murphy is not obligated to confer with the parents or the parishioners with regard to his decisionmaking process as it relates to the hiring and firing of a principal. Your principal was not fired, his contract was not renewed. It is a shame that so many have resorted to mudslinging that others now feel the need to respond in a way that you can relate to. You have acted like a bunch of spoiled brats. Scream and have a temper tantrum and expect to get your way. The Diocese has responded exactly how one should deal with such behavior, ignore it. To do otherwise would encourage this type of behavior in the future. Catholic school is not a public school it is like a private club, you choose to belong you play by the rules. If you don't like the rules, join a different club. You are always free to go to Berkeley Carroll or one of the other excellent private schools in the area. Or for that matter one of the excellent public schools in the area. Surely they would love to have you and your misguided activism. You choose to send your children to St Saviour, so you are bound by Fr. Murphys decisions. Suck it up and shut up already. You have torn your parish apart and have been disruptive, rude and obnoxious for far too long. The reign of King James is over!!!!!!!!!! Give Ms. Lorenzen the chance she deserves. You might be pleasantly surprised.
Fr. Murhpy supporters are many, fortunately or unfortunately, we have far too much class to get down in the mud with you. Hopefully when the dust clears you will be able to heal yourselves. One can only hope and pray! "
Junie wrote on Jul 16, 2009 4:48 PM:
R my name is Ri...cki wrote on Jul 16, 2009 6:42 PM:
Team Murphy wrote on Jul 16, 2009 7:32 PM:
John H wrote on Jul 16, 2009 7:34 PM:
Joe wrote on Jul 16, 2009 7:40 PM:
Legal Eagle wrote on Jul 16, 2009 8:26 PM:
Flan Again wrote on Jul 16, 2009 8:43 PM:
Dissident wrote on Jul 16, 2009 9:49 PM:
Im So Bloggin Confused wrote on Jul 17, 2009 12:05 AM:
John H wrote on Jul 17, 2009 12:32 AM:
Davis wrote on Jul 17, 2009 6:06 AM:
"Fr. Daniel Murphy’s pastoral assignment from 2000-2004 reflected the world-wide shortage of priests. For the first time in our long history, lay administrators were hired to handle the day-to-day operation of the parish. Extensive renovation took place in the Rectory and the parish grounds were lavishly landscaped. Quite unexpectedly, Fr. Murphy was transferred to St. Saviour’s in Brooklyn . . ." Fr. King, pastor, specifically allowed this unkind statement to be publicly made.
There is no "Team Murphy." This is not a game. The Diocese has not ignored this, it has been featured on its own TV station and newspaper. It's own sponsored arbitration found Flanagan's contract rights were violated and found against the pastor. That means something and has eroded confidence that the pastor is fair. After closing 30+ failed school, the Bishop now has a pastor cause him serious problems with a healthy school. The statements about the pastor's role fly directly opposed to the Bishop's own words about parental involvement. "Parents can never be left out of the equation. Without them the education process would be truly deficient." "
Joe wrote on Jul 17, 2009 9:46 AM:
Team Murphy Teammate wrote on Jul 17, 2009 9:48 AM:
Murphys Law wrote on Jul 17, 2009 11:01 AM:
Neil Young wrote on Jul 17, 2009 11:07 AM:
When you're out of the blue and into the black. "
the bright side wrote on Jul 17, 2009 11:31 AM:
Arts & Crafts stores in Park Slope had huge increases in revenue from the sale of oat tag & magic markers;
Kids received a lot of exercise by walking the picket line "
Edward A. Puydak wrote on Jul 17, 2009 11:38 AM:
I find it ironic that those supporting Murphy state how bad the Flanagan supporters must be because we dig up dirt, dare to challenge our pastor and a whole mess of other things. My favorite quote is
"'concerning most, if not all of the "Team Flanagan" players who post comments. They are rude, arrogant, belittling, often spewing out and out lies behind the safety of their keyboards"....
It seems both sides are doing it. I'm not one to say "when in Rome" so for those who want to take the high road, please take the high road. Don't take the low road and then claim nobility on the high road. If you are taking the high road, PUT YOUR NAME on it and stand behind your words.
Another favorite comment was
"Those of us who back Father Murphy's decision choose not to waste tax dollars and police power by counter picketing. I personally think having young children picketing outside while carrying signs with messages they most likely don't even understand is a little too Jonestownish for my taste."
Heaven forbid this country ever chooses to save money over not protesting just causes. I could only imaging Moses telling God that "well this exodus is going to costs us a lot of money and lives, can we not go please. Our taxes are just going to go up to pay the Pharaoh's police"
As far as the kids, they are going to a good school, they know what the signs mean. Also, Jesus listened to the children, why don't you.
Mudslinging aside, WE Flanagan supports aren't spewing out lies. We did our homework. We discovered Murphy's past and we also know that Flanagan wasn't given due process (not our words, an independent board said that). WE know Murphy is misusing his power to just get his way, is trying to make more money on the back of the parents and just want his friends installed (if not friends close associates who are "yes" people). Why make the announcement after the non-refundable deposits for the next year. Why was there no interview process. BUT I have already explained this as stated in my previous comment, WHERE I GAVE MY FULL NAME.
I DID NOTICE that for all the Murphy supporters NOT ONE of you gave rebuttal to my comments. SO you can mudsling, but not argue facts.
My skin will continue to have a healthy shine.
EDward A. Puydak
Salutatorian - Class of 1986
One of Eight Puydak's to attend St. Saviour
Family in parish since 1910 "
Page 6 wrote on Jul 17, 2009 11:52 AM:
Flan A Gone wrote on Jul 17, 2009 12:46 PM:
liars shysters and bores -- oh my wrote on Jul 17, 2009 1:04 PM:
And another thing... wrote on Jul 17, 2009 1:30 PM:
You may be enjoying the healthy shine of your skin, but what about the blood on your hands? "
Joe wrote on Jul 17, 2009 2:14 PM:
Lairs shysters and bores rebuttal wrote on Jul 17, 2009 2:50 PM:
"Father Murphy's "sudden departure " from there had less to do with him and more to do with the parishioners." Your quote. Wow, that is one hell of a statement from you. WHY WOULD HIS PARISHIONERS have asked him to leave? Please explain your words. That kind of just backs up what I'm saying.
Didnt get my info from Father King. But are you implying that Father King can't be trusted or that his short tenure there means less for him as a priest. Another interesting statement. What did you mean with this sentence. Are you stating not all priest tell the truth? And most people are not disgruntled. Some people just speak out about the things they see that don't seem right.
My point on his past is that it seems to be repeating itself. It seems he has a pattern. I'd worry about "leaders" going from place to place doing the same things which seems to be the reason they have to go from place to place. Why does he get people disgruntled. That is the questions I am really starting to focus on. He is a priest, isn't he suppose to work well with everyone? And a priest explaining themselves could actually be used to well, maybe educate his flock? Missed opportunity here to maybe unite the parish. Regardless on which side you are on, shouldn't we expect more from our priest. And if we shouldn't expect more then we must approach his decision like we would approach a laymen's decision that we find questionable.
Also, since you are so close to him, please explain his comments that he finds Children "draining". And who would ever think he has children's best interest at heart after such a statement.
And the idea that kids dont understand since some adults don't word it properly, if we let attitudes like your be the prevalent one, then they will never know the difference. You would be surprised what kids know nowadays. Try talking to them. They are pretty dam smart
Yes, its within his power to appoint a principal. WE do know that. It has been expressed enough. People want to know why. Politicians have the authority to do many things, don't you ever question their motives. At least you can vote them out of office. Because Murphy is a priest are you saying we should never questions him.
An inquiry by the diocese's Office of the Superintendent found that proper procedures weren't followed.
I have not nor will not bash Maura Lorenzen. She will have a hard enough time at her new job.
Jesus would understand and He would TALK with US to bring us together. Isnt that what we learned about Him? It is a very true sign since currently the parish is divided because of one man's actions. And would Jesus Condone it? Maybe he would. how do we know. I would assume Jesus has good inside info privy to neither of us.
No one here is talking about casting stones and being perfect. the parents asked for an explanation and were told that weren't entitled to one. Then petty stuff was release by Father Murphy.
Tuition raises will be inevitable, but the Bishop did state in his new vision for the school that they must remain affordable. Dramatic increases in tuition should not happen. Especially when the school already makes its costs back and is self reliant. I did point out that the attitude of "not wasting tax payer money" over fighting for a good cause was ludicrous. You really can't compare the two concepts of excellent education and freedom of speech or right to protest. You can get educated without the freedoms.
I would want to know if the school is already self sufficient, why does tuition need to go up and where will that extra money go.
Whether you use you name or not i really don't care. Just thought I'd put it out there for people to practice what they preach. WE were all taught to take responsibility for what we say. AS a catholic and an individual with a proper upbringing I stand up for my actions and words. I would understand you would do that as well and that if we ever met, would be able to introduce ourselves and have a healthy debate about the many irregularities of this situation.
Funny part is, you still never gave rebuttal to my first posted comment. it seems no one can't tell me that the ongoing are not happening. In other words, things can't be denied. Smells funky to me.
But like I said before, I take the high road.
ed P "
EDP wrote on Jul 17, 2009 2:54 PM:
Loved the comment.
You mean for the audacity to use the intelligence God gave me and challenge those that may be doing something unjust.
Isn't that exactly what we are all called to do?
I hate to bring up a reference where more people should have challenged the church to do something proper. "
Youre No Ones Cup Of... wrote on Jul 17, 2009 3:18 PM:
Wrong again, Joe. Or should I say Mole. We see your true colors shining through, we see your true colors, that's why we pity you. You are a pathetic excuse for a Christian, Catholic and human being. And the likes of you is why the tides are turning against you and yours. Not that there's anything wrong with it. Give my regards to Old Scratch Joe and don't forget the aloe, I hear it works great on burns! "
concerned citizen wrote on Jul 17, 2009 3:19 PM:
Youre No Ones Cup... wrote on Jul 17, 2009 3:33 PM:
Regards,
Liars, Shysters and Bores/Legal Eagle "
Joe wrote on Jul 17, 2009 3:49 PM:
Village Person wrote on Jul 17, 2009 3:53 PM:
Can Opener wrote on Jul 17, 2009 4:06 PM:
Gertrude wrote on Jul 17, 2009 4:10 PM:
Who fired the principal without proper procedures and then refused to meet with the parents who pleasded for some explanation after the first installment of non-refundable tuition?
If Fr. Murphy were a true Pastor of his Flock or even an able administrator, he would have met with the parents and given some explanation for his actions, but he did not.
So please tell me WHO is responsible for shattering our parish? "
Joe wrote on Jul 17, 2009 4:26 PM:
You Play you pay... wrote on Jul 17, 2009 4:38 PM:
Joe wrote on Jul 17, 2009 4:48 PM:
Im Throwing Down My Gloves wrote on Jul 17, 2009 5:21 PM:
I'm going to skip the smart aleck retorts I have in my mind and just respond to some inaccuracies that appeared in your reply to me. I'd like to think I'm a good judge of character, and I believe you are sincere in your wanting to fully understand the tug of war/war of words that has erupted in the parish. First let me clarify some of what I wrote. If you reread, you will see I wrote "Perhaps Father Murphy's "sudden departure" from there had less to do with him and more to do with the parishioners." (The key word being PERHAPS). My statement was in response to Davis' post (July 17, 2009 6:06 am)which quoted (allegedly) from Holy Child Jesus' church history which stated in part, "Quite unexpectedly, Father Murphy was transferred to St. Saviours in Brooklyn." This statement followed "Extensive renovation took place in the Rectory and the parish grounds were lavishly landscaped." (The implication being, I believe, this was the reason for Fr. Murphy's transfer.) As for Father King, I know absolutely nothing about him, have never met him. I merely mentioned him because his name came up in Davis' post. Davis wrote, "Fr. King, pastor, specifically allowed this unkind statement to be publicly made." I simply googled Father King's name and came across a recent article (a very benign article, nothing scandalizing) about the different priests who were being installed at various parishes within the diocese. I think the article was dated May 2009. The article gave dates of his past assignments. I just found it curious that some people think there is something untoward about Fr. Murphy's "quite unexpected" departure from HCJ after 4 years when Fr. King served approximately 2 and a half years there. I don't know the circumstances of his departure, not would I venture to speculate. Please don't infer otherwise. I would be delighted to explain my loyalty to Fr. Murphy. Believe me, I am not some fanatical cult zombie, as some on this blog have intimated. It is not a blind faith. It is quite a lengthy story and I am pressed for time. I will not post it here, too many haters, and sad to say, I feel like I, too, was lured into the luridness. The devil must be dancing a jig of joy. I will explain why I really and truly believe Father Murphy's heart is in the right place and why I think the whole "children drain me" was totally blown out of proportion. I know him, and I know better. Blog to you soon! "
Proud Mary wrote on Jul 17, 2009 5:22 PM:
Im Throwing Down My Gloves wrote on Jul 17, 2009 5:33 PM:
See earlier post. But here's one for the road...
Mind? Nah, go to www.saintsaviourchurch.org
to remind yourself what Saint Saviour Church is all about.
Note: This is only my opinion, but I think ALL of us should. "
Im Throwing Down My Gloves wrote on Jul 17, 2009 5:46 PM:
Whoops, I forgot one thing--I did not mean to imply the parishioners asked Father Murphy to leave. Maybe he wanted to leave them, or maybe it was simply a decision by the diocese. Same for Father King?? "
Concerned St. Saviour Parent wrote on Jul 17, 2009 6:02 PM:
Sure, he does not HAVE to do this. It is not his obligation, but it just seems to me to be the right thing to do.
I would also like to respectfully ask that the silly juvenile name calling stop. It makes all of us look bad. "
Concerned St. Saviour Parent wrote on Jul 17, 2009 6:05 PM:
saintsaviourchurch.org wrote on Jul 17, 2009 6:12 PM:
There is a very deep desire in all of us to find ourselves “home”. Home is that secure and peaceful place where we feel safe, not judged, unconditionally loved. Home is a place deep within our hearts where we experience our worth and value as a beloved child of God. Home is the place where we feel connected. Home is that place where they always welcome you, no matter what.
It is our deepest desire that your experience of St. Saviour Parish is an experience of home, a place where we communicate to you your dignity and worth – a place where you feel safe and secure. We at St. Saviour want to do all that we can do to make our parish family a place where all feel welcomed and loved.
Some people, for whatever reason, feel estranged from the family of the Catholic Church. They believe they no longer “fit in” because of divorce and remarriage or because of some past mistake which continues to make them feel shame or paralyzing guilt. IN ADDITION, SOME PEOPLE FEEL THAT ESTRANGEMENT BECAUSE THEY WERE “TURNED OFF” DUE TO A LACK OF SENSITIVITY COMING FROM A CHURCH LEADER. And some people just don’t believe that the Catholic Church has anything to say to them…" "
the above comment wrote on Jul 17, 2009 6:21 PM:
D. T. wrote on Jul 17, 2009 6:52 PM:
In my attempt to be flippant, I somehow gave Joe the impression I was Mike. I was in fact, the poster. In return, Joe said some very nasty, hurtful things to/about him, on this, a public forum. Things which are untrue. I take full responsibility for this and I sincerely apologize to Mike for my role in hurting him and his family. "
Cindy Brolsma wrote on Jul 17, 2009 9:24 PM:
1. What is the new paradigm for Catholic schools being developed by the Diocese of Brooklyn?
Over the last several years, parents have elected to send their child to the Catholic school that best meets the child’s needs. Sometimes this is not the local parish school but another Catholic school in the neighborhood or even a school close to parents’ place of employment. At the same time, schools have begun to develop stronger bonds within and across the community. The emerging paradigm is one that creates multiple relationships that extend beyond the parish to support and strengthen each Catholic school.
2. How is this new paradigm being developed?
This new paradigm is being developed through four initiatives that together form “Preserving the Vision.” First, we must root all that we do in prayer and reflection. As a people of faith, we are not entering into complex negotiations that will lead to compromises but rather a process of discernment, asking for the Lord’s grace to understand what His will is for us as a people. From this starting point of prayer, we will enter into a process of re-configuring and re-imagining our schools. This process will involve seven steps, including data analysis, local informational meetings, opportunity for feedback, introduction of proposed “plans” for each region of the diocese, a second opportunity for local consultation and the creation of a final, diocesan-wide road map for the future of our schools.
An additional component is the establishment of a “blue-ribbon panel” to review the data and ensure the integrity of our process. Following this process a plan for the alignment of our parishes and schools will emerge. This will establish a bond between every parish and school throughout the diocese.
Finally, we will introduce over a period of four years a new model of governance in our schools. This system of governance will empower competent lay leaders to take a limited, active role in the governance of our schools.
3. Why is the diocese undertaking “Preserving the Vision” at this time?
Since the paradigm of “multiple partnerships” has already begun to emerge over the last few years in a variety of ways, diocesan leaders wish to lead a strategic planning process that will allow us the opportunity to make proactive decisions to foster this paradigm in the final shape of the model in each school. Today, parents rightly apply a number of criteria when selecting a Catholic school for their child. A school’s curriculum and programs are often as important as the parish with which a particular school is associated. If Catholic schools are to continue to thrive they must be flexible enough to change and meet the modern needs of parents.
4. Is the current financial climate playing a role in this process?
The significant economic challenges that Catholic families face today require that the Church ensure that costs associated with Catholic elementary school education remain as affordable as possible. To do so, we must be good stewards of the resources available to us. This process will result in a more targeted expenditure of resources for the good of all children in Catholic schools.
5. Is declining enrollment at diocesan schools a factor in the need for change?
As a result of shifting demographics, enrollment in Catholic schools has significantly declined. Consequently approximately 16% of all currents seats in our Catholic elementary schools remain unfilled. This places a significant financial burden on remaining parents and the local parish. We need to undergo this strategic planning process in order to strengthen and preserve the mission of Catholic schools.
6. How will cultivating multiple partnerships ensure the future of Catholic schools?
Catholic schools already depend upon multiple partnerships. Two examples of such partnerships are the creation of school advisory boards and the involvement of donors and benefactors who generously raise scholarship money for our children. This process hopes to forge more partnerships within the broader community to ensure that our schools become viable, vital, excellent and enduring for many years to come.
7. What is the concept of two-tier governance?
The concept of two-tier governance is a model that is employed by many of our Catholic high schools. The purpose for introducing this new governance model over the next four years is to allow lay leaders the opportunity to give of their talent and expertise in strengthening the overall mission of each Catholic school through the responsible, limited exercise of governance over certain aspects of a school’s life.
This new role for lay leaders will strengthen the Catholic identity of each school by empowering the local clergy with the specific responsibility for the faith formation of our children. At the same time, it recognizes that the fiduciary responsibility for a school must be shared with the laity of the community.
Thus our schools will continue to be the very best choice for parents concerned with the faith formation and education of our children; at the same time it will enable our schools to rely upon the expertise of those in the community to ensure long-term viability.
8. Why is the diocese taking this approach of individual meetings with various groups in order to develop this paradigm for the future?
The diocese recognized that any effort to preserve the vision of Catholic education must be consultative and collaborative in nature. For this reason, we begin together in prayer, so that we all may be open to where the Lord may lead us in this endeavor.
Moreover, the diocese recognizes that only by broad consultation will we be able to arrive at a correct analysis of the facts. From this analysis, we will create a plan that takes into account the many concerns of all who form part of our school communities.
9. Is there a relationship between the necessity of this new vision for our schools and the consolidation of parishes?
There is no direct relationship between the consolidation of parishes and the emerging vision for our schools. At the same time, there are many parallels in the two processes. Each begins in prayer and each involves broad collaboration. As a result, a consensus emerges.
10. What are the ultimate benefits for children, parents, principals and faculty with this new model?
We believe that as a result of this process we will have schools that have more resources at their disposal to ensure that more children will have access to Catholic education.
We believe that Catholic schools will be better positioned to attend to the diverse needs of our students and parents.
At the same time, we will be able to ensure that thriving Catholic schools will be better able to offer teachers and staff competitive compensation and benefits and remain vital institutions in our diocese for generations to come. . "
Cindy Brolsma wrote on Jul 17, 2009 9:42 PM:
NEWS
THE ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF BROOKLYN
75 Greene Avenue
Brooklyn, NY 11238 Office of the Vicar General
(718) 399-5995
For Immediate Release
Contact
Most Reverend Frank J. Caggiano, VG
Diocese Announces Final Decisions Regarding
Draft Reconfiguration Proposals
Beginning in January, 2009, the diocesan committee overseeing the school strategic planning process in Brooklyn and Queens entitled “Preserving the Vision” held more than 35 consultation meetings in every region of the Diocese of Brooklyn, to review the 29 draft proposals that were submitted for comment. An unprecedented amount of feedback and suggested revisions were received by the diocesan committee in the weeks that followed.
The committee subsequently reviewed all the feedback, adopted a number of revisions to its initial draft proposals and submitted its revised proposals to the Most Reverend Nicholas DiMarzio, Bishop of Brooklyn, for final approval.
After careful study and reflection, the Bishop made his final decisions and has authorized their publication.
* Eight elementary schools will close at the end of the current school year, in June, 2009. They are: Flatbush Catholic Academy (Bk), St. Vincent Ferrer School (Bk), Most Precious Blood School (Bk), St. Benedict Joseph Labre School (Qns), St. Catherine of Sienna School (Qns), St. Aloysius School (Qns), St. Ann School (Qns) and Blessed Sacrament School (Jackson Heights, Qns).
* St. Elizabeth Ann Seton School (Bk) will be permitted to reopen in September, 2009, and is invited to seek designation as a diocesan mission school.
* Our Lady of Perpetual Help School (Bk) will be permitted to remain open as a parochial school.
* In the Flatbush section of Brooklyn, Saint Jerome School, St. Therese of Lisieux School and St. Catherine of Genoa School will remain open as parochial schools while beginning a planning process to create a single, regional academy in September, 2010, that will utilize all three of their current sites.
* The Bishop has also accepted the alternative proposals offered by the leadership of Our Lady of Angels School (Bk) and St. Anthony of Padua School (Qns), seeking the conversion of these schools into independent Catholic academies. It is expected that these two new academies will open in September, 2009.
* In the Windsor Terrace section of Brooklyn, the proposed merger of Immaculate Heart of Mary School (Bk) and Holy Name School (Bk) will not occur in the upcoming school year. Instead, each school will remain as a parochial school while lay leaders from each parish will form a Task Force to bring these two school communities closer together.
* In Flushing, St. Michael School will remain open as a parochial school while Mary’s Nativity School will be the site for a new Catholic academy to open in September, 2009.
* Three parochial schools accepted the invitation to become Catholic academies. They are Our Lady of Grace School (Qns) which will reopen in September, 2009 as Ave Maria Catholic Academy, St. Anastasia School (Qns) which will reopen in September, 2009 as Divine Wisdom Catholic Academy, and Our Lady of the Miraculous Medal School (Qns) which will reopen in September, 2009 as Notre Dame Catholic Academy of Ridgewood.
On Thursday evening, February 12, 2009, Bishop DiMarzio made an Internet-based presentation, addressing the faithful of Brooklyn and Queens regarding “Preserving the Vision”. His remarks are available at three Internet sites: (1) the diocesan website (www.dioceseofbrooklyn.org); (2) the website dedicated to Preserving the Vision (www.csptv.org); and (3) YouTube (title: Preserving the Vision).
“Change is never easy. Sometimes, it is even painful. My thoughts and prayers are with the students, parents, and teachers whose schools will be consolidated in June. I want to assure you that we will do everything we can to assure that your child finds a seat in the school of your choice,” said Most Reverend Nicholas DiMarzio of the Diocese of Brooklyn.
The Bishop concluded his Internet presentation to the people of the Diocese of Brooklyn with the following words: “My friends, we have begun a new chapter in the life of our schools. The next few years will bring exciting innovations, additional programs and the birth of new, quality academies that will pass on the vision of Catholic education for generations to come! Together, let us resolve to begin this new chapter in Catholic school education together.” "
Maybe Baby wrote on Jul 17, 2009 10:00 PM:
John H wrote on Jul 17, 2009 10:13 PM:
Slope Hope wrote on Jul 17, 2009 11:23 PM:
John H wrote on Jul 18, 2009 8:09 AM:
Murphs Smurfs wrote on Jul 18, 2009 9:21 AM:
Rich wrote on Jul 18, 2009 9:54 AM:
John H wrote on Jul 18, 2009 10:03 AM:
Concerned Catholic wrote on Jul 18, 2009 10:13 AM:
murphs smurfs teammate wrote on Jul 18, 2009 11:19 AM:
John H wrote on Jul 18, 2009 4:47 PM:
Court Jester wrote on Jul 18, 2009 6:14 PM:
John H wrote on Jul 18, 2009 7:18 PM:
St. Saviour Parent and Alum wrote on Jul 19, 2009 12:45 AM:
A principled Person wrote on Jul 19, 2009 8:13 AM:
Dear Prinicpled P wrote on Jul 19, 2009 2:48 PM:
This open debate is also clearly illustrated by Only The Blog Knows Brooklyn which is run by a friend of the new principal candidate. The arguments are there warts and all. http://onlytheblogknowsbrooklyn.typepad.com/
Let the truth set us free. "
Mom wrote on Jul 19, 2009 3:24 PM:
Father Murphy Fan wrote on Jul 19, 2009 4:26 PM:
qoute qoute wrote on Jul 24, 2009 11:26 PM:
IsItMe wrote on Jul 28, 2009 4:31 PM:
Spelling Art 101 wrote on Jul 28, 2009 5:40 PM:
John H wrote on Jul 28, 2009 10:23 PM:
Answer wrote on Jul 29, 2009 7:55 AM:
Interested Agnostic wrote on Aug 1, 2009 1:50 PM:
I was so interested, that I read all of the other links concerning this sad story and I have to say that I think (as an outside observer) that the protesters are really not doing anything useful at this point, other than making a bad situation worse, and making certain that the new principal will have a terrible time leading the school in her new position. By this protesting, the parents are inadvertently teaching their children that the new principal is somehow worse that the old one, and that the pastor does not care about them or their school. Children will pick up on the hostility that has clearly been demonstrated here and in other forums I have read, and that is especially damaging, for both the school and for the church as a whole. Christianity is usually about turning the other cheek, and no good can come from trying to undermine a pastor's decision.
While the pastor may have made a poor decision in not allowing the old principal to continue in his position and allow for a smooth transition for the sake of the children, my sense is that there must have been a very big reason that the principal had to be let go at this point--contracts can be very difficult to sort out, and perhaps there were extenuating circumstances that can not be revealed for any number of reasons. While cronyism could be one reason, it would be awfully foolish of this pastor to bring such heat and ire upon himself just to protect or enrich one or two people (including himself).
On the face of it, the balance of a smooth transition, and the better outcome of waiting another year for the old principal's retirement, does seem to outweigh the negatives of turning the entire school and parish community into factions of pro and con. All this-- for the sake of one or two personal jobs? I can't believe that one man would be that foolish. I am inclined to think that there must be more to this story that probably never will be uncovered given the church's long reputation for secrecy and hidden agendas.
The protesters at this point have two choices. They should stop right now and get used to the status quo that the church has imposed on them (and this is not the first time the church has ever done this to people) OR they can vote with their feet and pull their children out of the school. Nothing will come of this continued protesting and arguing about motives, pastoral shenanigans, and hidden agendas.
This principal, for better or worse is gone. There is no way that will ever get undone, given the church's policies of "my way or the highway". It is time for people to move forward and either accept it, or leave the school, or even leave the parish. That is a language that the church does understand, and there is no reason to drop money in a place where you don't feel welcome. Brooklyn is the borough of churches, and there is always someone else down the street happy to welcome you.
Good Luck to the new principal, and may God bless her and the children because they will need all the help they can get thanks to this damaging culture of protest. A sad situation that needs to stop. Please consider it. "
Joseph wrote on Aug 1, 2009 11:19 PM:
Hear Hear wrote on Aug 2, 2009 6:41 PM:
The facts dont lie wrote on Aug 2, 2009 8:15 PM:
Agnostic wrote on Aug 2, 2009 8:18 PM:
John H wrote on Aug 2, 2009 8:29 PM:
Hear Hear wrote on Aug 2, 2009 10:06 PM:
Hear What wrote on Aug 2, 2009 11:08 PM:
John H wrote on Aug 3, 2009 7:58 AM:
HEAR NOW wrote on Aug 3, 2009 10:05 AM:
Hear Hear wrote on Aug 3, 2009 11:26 AM:
John H wrote on Aug 3, 2009 8:00 PM:
Hear it is wrote on Aug 3, 2009 8:12 PM:
Submit a Comment
|












Sebastian Flyte wrote on Jul 10, 2009 12:25 PM: